Where the heck has the Connecticut
legislature been for the past few months?
With so many pressing issues, why haven’t they met?
Oh, they’ll tell you it’s because
of safety that they couldn’t convene. But we know better. Plenty of state legislatures… even the
US House of Representatives… have carried on the people’s business
virtually or well-masked while our pols went AWOL.
No, Connecticut’s lawmakers
finished the budget and just scurried home, leaving the running of the state to
Governor Lamont by executive order. Now
they’re jealous of his success.
Ned Lamont is no Andrew Cuomo, but most
Nutmeggers think he’s done a pretty good job as his poll
ratings have never been higher: 78% of respondents in a recent Q Poll said
he was doing a good job handling the pandemic.
So now our legislators are saying
they’ve been left out? Seasoned members
of the House tell me their leadership “ceded governing” to Lamont while others
told me, “I’m anxious to come back. I
shake hands for a living”. Well, not
anymore.
Not that legislators haven’t been
busy. Doubtless your State Rep and
Senator’s been filling your social media feed with pictures of them passing out
face masks, gathering donations for food drives and dining al fresco to help
local business.
And your mailbox is doubtless stuffed
with their long, anguished e-letters about “living in extraordinary times” and
“adapting to the new normal”. They talk
about helping constituents navigating the state’s bureaucracy, which is their
job.
All that’s super. But what about fulfilling their real responsibility…
making laws?
Having quarantined, done their
volunteer photo-ops and social media updates, now, finally, they’re ready to
get back to their work.
BEWARE THE IMPLEMENTER
Sometime this month our lawmakers
will return to Hartford for a quick session but one fraught with danger… not to
their health, but to the public good.
They’re going to meet, debate and vote on “the Implementer”.
You see, after a bill becomes law,
legislators must “implement” it to make it go into effect. Easy stuff… if that’s all they do.
But instead, The Implementer may
become a giant Christmas tree, laden with special bills, good and bad, taken in
one up-or-down, all-or-nothing vote.
Some of these “emergency certified” bills have had hearings, but most
have not. Why slow up the lawmaking
process by actually engaging the public?
Worse yet, in this hyperspeed
law-making process, many lawmakers aren’t even given time to read, let alone
understand, what they are voting on. Leaders
just deliver a 500-page document that they then must vote on in 48 hours.
Think of all the topics these
lawmakers played hookey on for the past three months: sports betting, vaccine mandates, absentee
ballot reform, police accountability and, yes, transportation investment.
Lawmakers didn’t have the
guts to vote on tolls. So why rush
through these crucial issue now instead of waiting ‘til the next session?
Should our elected representatives
vote on these issues in just 48 hours without putting these “ill-conceived,
poorly drafted, and hastily reviewed” bills (as one
Republican called them) through the usual committee review, public
hearing and debate process? I think not.
Even if we agree on the
need for some of these measures, shouldn’t they all be reviewed and voted on
separately, not force-fed as an all-or-nothing “dog’s breakfast” (as one
veteran described it to me)?
However well-intentioned,
the end does not justify the means.
Posted
with permission of Hearst CT Media
No comments:
Post a Comment